TABLES
|
|
Table
1.1:
|
Voters'
Main Source of News
|
Table
2.1:
|
Journalism
Professionals' Statements Identifying
Those to Whom the Media Owe Accountability
|
Table
2.2:
|
Journalism
Professionals' Statements Identifying
the Values, Behaviours and Effects
for Which the Media should be
Held Accountable
|
Table
3.1:
|
Journalists'
Attitudes to Certain Ethical Issues
|
Table
3.2:
|
Circumstances
in Which Certain Activities are
Justified (Journalists)
|
Table
3.3:
|
Journalists'
Perceptions of Journalists as
Truth-Tellers
|
Table
3.4:
|
Comparison
of Journalists' Attitudes in Us,
Britain, Germany And Australia
|
Table
3.5:
|
Voters'
Perceptions of Journalists
|
Table
3.6:
|
Voters'
Attitudes to Certain Ethical Issues
|
Table
3.7:
|
Circumstances
in Which Certain Activities are
Justified (Voters)
|
Table
3.8:
|
Voters'
Perceptions of Journalists as
Truth-Tellers
|
Table
3.9:
|
Comparison
of Journalists' and Voters' Attitudes
on Certain Ethical Issues
|
Table
3.10:
|
Comparison
of Journalists' and Voters' Perceptions
of Journalists as Truth-Tellers
|
Table
3.11:
|
Proportion
of Australian Voters Who Say Journalists
Have High or Very High Standards
of Ethics or Honesty
|
Table
4.1:
|
Journalists'
Assessment of Journalists' Performance
|
Table
4.2:
|
Importance
U.S. and Australian Journalists
Assign to Various Media Roles
|
Table
4.3:
|
Voters'
Assessment of Journalists' Performance
|
Table
4.4:
|
Comparison
of Journalists' and Voters' Assessment
of Media Performance
|
Table
5.1:
|
Total
Complaints against Commercial
Broadcasters Investigated by the
ABA 2000-2003
|
Table
5.2:
|
Outcomes
of News and Current Affairs Complaints
against Commercial Broadcasters
2000-2003
|
Table
5.3:
|
Outcomes
of Complaints against News and
Current Affairs Programs by Complaint
Type 2000-2003
|
Table
5.4:
|
Journalists'
Rating of the Australian Broadcasting
Authority
|
Table
5.5:
|
Voters'
Awareness of Where to Go to Complain
About a Journalist's Performance
(ABA)
|
Table
6.1:
|
Pattern
of Complaints Adjudicated by the
Australian Press Council 1993-2002
|
Table
6.2:
|
Outcomes
of Complaints Adjudicated by the
Australian Press Council 1993-2000
|
Table
6.3
|
Satisfaction
Levels of Complainants and Respondents
about the Australian Press Council's
Complaint Outcomes
|
|
|
Table
6.5:
|
Journalists'
Rating of The Australian Press
Council
|
Table
6.6:
|
Voters'
Awareness of Where to Go to Complain
about a Journalist's Performance
(Press Council)
|
Table
7.1:
|
Pattern
of Complaints Dealt With by the
MEAA Ethics Panel, Victoria, 1993-2002
|
Table
7.2:
|
Journalists'
Rating of the MEAA Ethics Panel
|
Table
7.3:
|
Voters'
Awareness of Where to Go to Complain
about a Journalist's Performance
(MEAA)
|
Table
7.4:
|
Journalists'
Rating of Media Watch
|
Table
7.5:
|
Voters'
Awareness of Where to Go to Complain
about a Journalist's Performance
(Media Watch)
|
Table
8.1:
|
Pattern
Of Complaints to the ABC concerning
News and Current Affairs Programs,
2001-2002
|
Table
8.2:
|
Pattern
of Complaints to the ABC concerning
News and Current Affairs Programs,
2003
|
Table
10.1:
|
Journalists'
Views of the 'Chilling Effect'
of Defamation Laws
|
Table
10.2:
|
Journalists'
Views of Compensation for Defamation
When Media Have Taken Due Care
|
Table
10.3:
|
Journalists'
Views of Compensation for Defamation
When Media Have Not Taken Due
Care
|
Table
10.4:
|
Public's
Views of Compensation for Defamation
When Media Have Taken Due Care
|
Table
10.5:
|
Public's
Views of Compensation for Defamation
When Media Have Not Taken Due
Care
|
|
|
FIGURES |
|
Figure
10.1: |
Number
of Defamation Actions against Fairfax
1989-2004 |
Figure
10.2: |
Costs
of Defamation Actions to Fairfax
1989-2004 |
|
|